|
Orphan Works Previous News & BackgroundOrphan Works Update, April '06 The ASMP, PACA, and PPA have been chosen to represent visual creators in a special meeting with the House Subcommittee on Intellectual Property
on Wednesday, March 15, regarding the proposed orphan works statute. They have asked artists & photographers to cease writing to Congress
immediately so as to represent us in a unified voice, and not come across as disorganized and disparate. Commentary White Paper on the Copyright Office's Orphan Works Study report Here is Lisa's commentary White Paper on the Copyright Office's
Orphan Works Study report and recommended statutory language. The Copyright Office has submitted the proposed statute to the Senate Judiciary
Committee. The Committee is expected to act on this soon. Commentary on Glushko-Samuelson Proposal for Orphan Works pdf here. Orphan Works Roundtable in Washington, D.C. Click the link below to read Lisa Shaftel's summary report on the Orphan Works U.S. Copyright Office Roundtable Discussions, held July 26 & 27 in Washington, D.C. Lisa Shaftel, Guild Advocacy Chair, wrote an initial Comment Letter on behalf of the Guild, and was invited to participate in all 4 sessions of discussion. It was a good mix of representation of creative organizations, and meaningful discussion ensued. Click here to download the pdf of Lisa's Summary Report. Original Notes on Copyright and "Orphan Works" What are the copyright issues involved in the 2004 Kahle vs. Ashcroft case? Why does Professor Lawrence Lessig argue that current copyright protection violates the US Constitution First Amendment Right to free speech and fails “To promote the progress of science and useful arts”? What does this perspective mean to the livelihood of creators of original works? This court case has prompted Congress to ask the Register of Copyrights to study the issue of “orphan works.” How does a copyrighted work become “orphaned”? How is an “orphan work” different from a work that has entered the Public Domain? Who wants to use “orphan works” and should they be granted permission to do so if the copyright holder cannot be located?
How is the US Copyright Office studying the issue of “orphan works”? What circumstances need to be considered? How does this comply with the TRIPS Agreement and the Berne Agreement?
Site copyright © 1995-2006, Graphic Artists Guild, 90 John Street, Suite 403, New York, NY 10038-3202; voice: 212-791-3400 |
|